You see, the battle against ignorance and suffering is a life-long battle, and our only consolation, aside of course having the good life, is an ice-cold beer by the end of every week. Cheers.

BA, MA Cand., in Philosophy

I could critique your written or visual work for a fee of book or cookies and cupcakes.

Since Wikipedia wouldn't simply do.

More of Joseph's books »
Joseph Guillermo's currently-reading book recommendations, reviews, favorite quotes, book clubs, book trivia, book lists

Joseph Guillermo

Create Your Badge

There are currently 32 monkeys typing randomly about Shakespeare.

Theme by nostrich.

3rd October 2011

Post with 116 notes

The problem with the anti-RH people is that they give too many bullets to the other camp.

But reading closely the argument that happened in the Senate, Sen. Miriam Santiago committed a straw man fallacy by proposing a complex question, to wit:

"If itis the position of Sen. Enrile that a sperm has life, of course, if a sperm has life, then that life should be protected. Therefore, in logic, when a person masturbates and releases all those sperms for nothing, he commits murder? Let’s think about that."

Where in fact, Enrile just reiterated a basic biological fact, to wit:

There is life already [in the sperm and the egg] but not yet a human life because a woman cannot produce a human being without the sperm of a man, and a man cannot produce a human being without the egg of the woman so these elements on their own have life.

Ergo, it is Miriam who said masturbation is abortion and not Enrile. 

In the final analysis, Enrile got the usual bad propaganda treatment the RH camp loves to use against its detractors. If anything, the one who are severely misinformed on bio-ethical issues are the two Senators (Miriam and Cayetano) who apparently have no internet access for still reiterating that there is no medical consensus on what exactly is human conception.

I mean, seriously, just Google conception and you’ll have statements like this:


If sperm does meet and penetrate a mature egg after ovulation, it will fertilize it. When the sperm penetrates the egg, changes occur in the protein coating around it to prevent other sperm from entering. At the moment of fertilization, your baby’s genetic make-up is complete, including its sex. Since the mother can provide only X chromosomes (she’s XX), if a Y sperm fertilizes the egg, your baby will be a boy (XY); if an X sperm fertilizes the egg, your baby will be a girl (XX).


Kids, stop reading humor sites for your news, ok?

Tagged: just sayinoh EnrileMiriamCayetanoRH BillfallacyDo I really need to point this out?

  1. ringjo reblogged this from theurbanhistorian
  2. brownmonkeytheory reblogged this from hisjerisprudence and added:
    Wait, what disagreement? Only politicians insist on a ‘disagreement’, there is none in the empirical sciences especially...
  3. computerangel98 reblogged this from theurbanhistorian
  4. nobodymeh reblogged this from juanrepublic
  5. midnightcrammer reblogged this from juanrepublic
  6. melalovemaker reblogged this from juanrepublic
  7. preoccupiedbyyou reblogged this from juanrepublic
  8. hisjerisprudence reblogged this from theurbanhistorian and added:
    Thing is, Science and the Catholic Church don’t agree on the same moment of conception. And that’s where all the...
  9. harmonyisjabulous reblogged this from juanrepublic
  10. thecatisdead reblogged this from theurbanhistorian and added:
  11. jeprocks reblogged this from theurbanhistorian
  12. geekysundae reblogged this from theurbanhistorian
  13. therryfichick reblogged this from juanrepublic
  14. tinkerbellie reblogged this from juanrepublic
  15. glurb reblogged this from theurbanhistorian
  16. myriahertz reblogged this from juanrepublic
  17. sagarberries reblogged this from juanrepublic
  18. murderotika reblogged this from juanrepublic
  19. technofirefly reblogged this from adettenotadeth and added:
    I still believe we need the RH bill, but it’s nice to always get both sides of things.